The Bridal gown project – A story of a lot of tule

A couple of years ago, after they got engaged, my brother’s fiancée asked me if I would be willing to make her wedding dress. As a rule, I don’t sew for others, but for this request I didn’t have to think long to say yes. One of the things which really helped, was that she also asked how long in advance I would like to start, to which I replied ‘about a year’. That meant that fall 2020 became the starting point of this special project. As the wedding is now done, it’s time to finally share the process!

The first thing we did, was to go to a bridal store to try some things on. She had an image in her head (and pictures via pinterest) of roughly what she wanted: a tulle/lace skirt, lace bodice and sheer top with lace on it. However, she is also decidedly shorter than the average bridal model, and she wanted to see how certain dresses looked on her. I would really recommend everyone who wants to make their own wedding dress to also do this, you cannot try on a dress which is being made for you, and it can really help to get a feel for what you like. The only important thing to remember is that if you want exactly the dress you tried on, you should probably just get that. A dress made for you can incorporate the same elements, but will always be a little bit different in the end.

After this excursion, the dress she liked most on herself was this one below, by Modeca. So this was the rough inspiration we started with. The main things which I changed already in my initial design was to slightly raise the dip in the front neckline, changing the back buttons to lacing (that’s more versatile size-wise) and removing the round lace on the train, as this would be very difficult to achieve with lace not created for this shape.

Next up was fabric shopping! In the end, we bought two types of tulle for the skirt, two types of lace, sheer fabric for the top, cotton for the base of the bodice and lining fabric for the skirt. In the rest of this post, I’ll take you with me on the base skirt construction in particular.

To make sure that a skirt has volume, there are several solutions. The first is layering. Historically, this is what petticoats do. The second is support structures, such as hoops. What happens mostly in current bridal fashion is a variant on layering which does not use separate skirts, but layers of ruffles attached to a base skirt. This helps to create more of an A-line shape where the top is still narrower, rather than the more bell-shaped version you see in historical silhouettes with many petticoats. In modern wear, this is typically done with very light fabrics, and in particular tulle.

For this skirt, I used two types of tulle. The first is the common, stiff tulle you can find cheaply in many colors. This has the advantage of being both stiff (less fabric creates more volume) and cheap (which is good, because you need a lot). However, it doesn’t look very luxurious. So on top, I used a softer, much nicer and finer bridal tulle. In total, the skirt has about 26m of tulle in it.

The base is a half circle of the stiff tulle. I temporarily attached this to a waistband elastic to be able to put it on the dummy and for fitting, and stitched some horizontal lines on it. The plan was that these would be the placement lines of rows of ruffles. Starting from the bottom, each row up would have an increasingly tightly gathered strip of ruffled tulle. In the end, I didn’t exactly follow my own stitch lines, but used them as a guide to stitch the ruffles on straight.

Then it was time for many, many, many strips of tulle. The strips were cut off, seamed together (with a narrow zigzag), a gathering stitch run through one end, gathered up, and pinned to the base skirt using stitch markers for knitting/crochet. These are basically non-sharp plastic safety pins, and perfect for a fabric which absolutely won’t hold pins. Then the whole thing was put under the machine, and stitched on.

As you can see, the monster slowly became bigger under my machine, and with the additional layers, you see that the skirt starts to stand out more. Although I planned the amount of layers and yardage per layer and length per layer and how much yardage I had in total, I did change this planning a few times throughout. Because maths. And also because I had never done this before, so I was going by eye on how big the skirt should become and how much fabric I had.

Somewhere half way through, I made the skirt lining. Made out of lining fabric (a little less than half a circle), this exists basically to make sure it feels nice against your legs. The stiff tulle isn’t very soft, and this makes it much more comfortable to wear. The hem on this is basically just a zig-zag, because it’s easier on a round edge, and you will never actually see this layer.

And then I went back to more layers. I stitched on a total of 5 layers of this stiff tulle, increasing how tightly gathered the strip was. As the base was a half circle, the skirt became narrower going to the top, so the area the strips covered did become smaller, but the ruffle-per-base cm ratio did increase a little bit every time.

The hard tulle stops a little while before the top of the skirt, because I wanted it to narrow out and not have too much of a bell shape. From this point, I added the soft tulle. The soft tulle was very wide (I believe 3m), so each layer has a fold at the top and basically has half the width as the length. I added one layer like this about 10cm below the waist, and then two more at the waistline. These layers aren’t gathered, but pleated as they would be more visible, and the pleats look nicer coming down from the bodice. I did knife pleats, with a box pleat center front, so the pleats all run towards the back.

The seam of the soft tulle is at the side. This means I had to cut a slit center back for the opening, but as the center back is also the middle part of the train, I didn’t want a seam coming down the whole length from there. To seam the soft tulle, I used a sheer nylon thread, and stitched down two edges on top of each-other by hand, for each of the six layers. You can see the seams if you look closely, but from a distance it’s completely invisible this way.

The final step was hemming! The train is basically formed by the half width (1,5cm) of the fabric falling down from the waist all the way at the back. Because the bride is fairly short, this creates a small train. To hem the skirt, I first cut all of the stiff tulle layers to the right length. Starting from the inner layer, and ensuring that each consecutive layer was just a little bit longer. This took a little while sitting on the floor because I did it layer by layer, but it worked well.

For the soft tulle, I safety-pinned it to the right length, we did another fitting to check, and then I cut off the layers one by one, shaping it into the train at the back. The one very big advantage of tulle: it doesn’t fray, so no need for any hemming aside from cutting it to length!

I have some of the soft tulle left over, but only from cutting a little of the length off at the front, all the rest was used up!

Hemming was the last stage of the base of the skirt. Between finishing the layers and hemming, I did also work on the bodice part, so the length could be checked with the full base of the dress on, and not just the skirt. This is helpful as this way, we’d know exactly how high the skirt would sit. In the next post, more about constructing the base for the bodice!

In the end, the skirt ended up a little fuller and slightly less pure A-line than the example skirt. However, I took pictures throughout, and we fitted the skirt shape a couple of time, and both the bride and me really liked the shape we ended up with.

A gown for lounging and mornings

The event I finally made my gold/black dress for was a couple of days. And late nights and early evenings call for a more relaxed type of dress. One I did not have in my closet, as most of my events are just the outside day affairs or balls.

I finished my gold ensemble (at least to the point of being wearable) a week before I had to leave. So of course, I decided I probably could made a morning gown in that time, right?

What helped was that I already had the fabric, the pattern and the plan.

A couple of months ago, a friend decided some fabric from Fabriclore, an Indian fabric shop, selling a wide range of beautiful fabrics. I joined in with that order, and got a couple of beautiful cotton prints, including one I knew I wanted to use for a morning/tea gown.

It’s a light cream crinkled cotton with a distinct texture. It’s very drapey, not quite sheer but near to it, and it has a beautiful hand-block print of little blue and green flowers on it. Morning gowns are often quite full and flowy, without the normal Victorian structure, so I knew it’d be perfect for that.

Pattern wise, I had seen Cynthia from Redthreaded adapt this Wearing History pattern for a morning jacket into a full dress. She has a video about that process here. I was lucky enough that the original pattern (which only comes in the one, original, size) was pretty much my size, so I knew I wouldn’t have to do too much to make it fit me. And Cynthia’s method of lengthening the jacket worked so beautifully, that I knew this would be the perfect solution to getting a dress instead of a jacket out of an existing pattern.

E-Pattern Victorian 1890s 1897 Morning Jacket Bust 36 image 1

The pattern is late 1890’s, and I particularly love the back design with the pleats which are a historicism echoing 18th century Watteau pleats. You see this a lot in the 1890’s, and in informal gowns in particular. This dress is also unfitted at the front, with just a belt, which is perfect if you want to wear this both with and without a corset. Although some of these dresses are completely unfitted at the waist, I do appreciate the belt to ‘break’ the silhouette a little bit. Below is a beautiful period example showing the typical types of pleats in the back:

Dressing gown, wool, American or European
Dressing gown1880–90, MET Museum

I made very few pictures of the process of making this, as I was on a tight deadline and Cynthia already has a video about how she made it. I chose to line the top (basically the original jacket part) with a plain white cotton. I also followed her method of gathering the bottom front and stitching it down a little lower, to create a tiny little ruffle. For the back, I chose pleats instead of the gathering shown on the pattern envelope, to make it look more like the extant dresses with pleats that I like so much. The pleats are stitched down to the lining to help them stay in the back a bit.

The skirt of the dress is not lined, to help with the flowy-ness. As the fabric is a little sheer, I did wear it with a petticoat underneath. This helps give some volume without weighing down the actual skirt of the dress.

I didn’t have time for trim, which I still might add later on, but for now I was really happy to finish it on time. I even opted to machine-sew the button holes, because although I like hand-sewn ones, I just didn’t have the time. Sometimes it’s good to allow yourself shortcuts if you know it’ll save you on stress and sleep while finishing something on time. And I’m really happy I managed to get this done in time to wear it, as I got a lot of use out of it as both an easy gown for breakfast and one for some relaxing after the dancing had finished in the evening. It was a wonderful lounging garment at a wonderful event!

A picture on the last morning, by Timelight Photographic:

St Audries Wedding Anniversary October 2021 (320).jpg

And two more with my own camera, to show the back:

Paisley silk brocade?

The 1880s gold bustle gown is made out of a silk brocade fabric with a paisley motif. I loved this fabric as soon as I saw it, because of the color and how it catches the light, but also as this motif is actually quite fitting to the era the dress is from. There is a lot of history behind it, and although appropriate to late Victorian western European dress, the origins of it lie somewhere else. So in this post, some information about it!

First: what is a paisley motif? Basically, it’s a tear-shaped form with usually a little curl at the end and curve to it, often with intricate floral like detailing in the center.

The motif is actually very old, and originates in Iran, where it is called ‘buteh’ (which in Persian can mean bush, thicket, bramble and herb). We don’t know exactly how old it is, but it can already be found in the Iranian Sassanian period (224-651 AD).

Silk Twill with Sassanian royal device (senmurv)
7-8th century CE, Victoria & Albert Museum, London

A couple of centuries later, the motif has spread and can be found in various other regions such as Afghanistan and Egypt. The motif slowly starts to develop the typical curve on the point which we associate with paisley today. The fragment below is from a city in Egypt which was under Sassanian control, at the end of the silk road of the time. It shows how far it was already spreading.

Silk fabric discovered Akhmim, Egypt and dated to 7th - 8th century CE
Silk fabric discovered Akhmim, Egypt and dated to 7-8th cent. CE
Lyon, musée historique des tissues Soieries Sassanides,
Coptes et Byzantines V – XI siècles
 by Marielle Martiniani-Reber

Between the 15th and 18th century, the shape also moved towards Mughal India (c. 1526-1857), taking a prominent place there. Specifically, it became a popular motif on the (goat) wool Kashmir shawls woven in the north of India. These were treasured art pieces.

Fragment top image
17th century Kashmir shawl fragment

It was via these kashmir shawls that the buteh motif was introduced to Europe. These fine quality shawls started as a trade item, but became an enormous hit. Their popularity really took off around the same time that the Empire fashion with thin fabrics and high waists became popular. Shawls were the perfect accessory for these light dresses.

Shawl top image
Shawl of pashmina wool (Kashmir goat hair). ca 1780, V&A

With this rise in popularity came the production of imitation kashmir shawls for the European market. Although they didn’t reach the craftmanship of the originals, there was such a demand that cheaper copies did very well. One of the most prominent places for the creation of these shawls was the Scottish town Paisley. There were other places in which shawls with buteh motifs were reproduced, but the name ‘paisley’ became synonymous with the shape in the English language.

Shawl top image
Woven silk shawl made in Paisley, ca. 1843-1847 (made) V&A

During the 19th century, these ‘paisley’ shawls remained a very fashionable item for decades. A part of the appeal of them was the general interest in the ‘unchanging, mystic east’, which they became to represent. Orientalism, and the taste for the ‘exotic’ remained very important in 19th century western Europe. Of course, this ‘mystic and unchanging’ was a European fantasy which doesn’t do justice to the local industries and the way kashmir shawls also adapted to fashion over time. With the powers of colonialism and European improvements in weaving (and, therefore, a reduced demand for the ‘real’ Indian thing), the Indian kashmir industry eventually fell apart. In the late 19th century, the paisley you see in western-European dress is mostly produced in Europe itself.

In the Netherlands, the most common version was a bit heavier and thicker than the French and English versions, and was called ‘carrot cloth’, probably because of the color? They were used as square shawls, but also to make dresses from.

ca 1890 dress, Kunstmuseum Den Haag

Due to its prominence in the 19th century, the paisley motif also appeared in many different types of regional dress, mostly through printed cottons which featured it. This happened in the Netherlands, but also for instance in France, Sweden or Romania.

Girl from Marken, showing the paisley motif on her sleeve.

In the 20th century, you see that the hippie movement revives the 19th century orientalism, and starts to incorporate middle-eastern garments and elements. Again, a feeling for the context and origin is usually missing, but it does revive an interest in non-European styles of dress. In the future, hopefully this interest will continue and expand, this time without the generalizations and colonialist views, and deepen the understanding of fashion as a truly global phenomenon, of which I think the buteh is a key example.

1970’s American advertisement featuring paisley motifs on a blouse.

If you want to learn more, I strongly recommend checking out the articles linked to below! I especially love the online TRC Exhibition ‘from buteh to paisley’, which has a lot of information and beautiful items from their collection. If you check out their instagram, you can also find the replay of a live tour they did through the physical version a little while ago!

Sources:

https://rangriwaaz.com/blogs/saree-draping-tips-by-rangriwaaz/boteh-the-journey-from-persia-to-paisley

http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/trade/paisley.htm

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20151021-paisley-behind-rocks-favourite-fashion

https://trc-leiden.nl/trc-digital-exhibition/index.php/from-buteh-to-paisley/item/262-cover-page

http://www.textileasart.com/exc_kash.htm

1880s Gold Bustle dress – All done!

In my two previous posts, I shared the progress of making an 1880’s gold/black bustle dress.

I’ve had the gold fabric for this dress for a while. The occasion to finally make this was a private anniversary in the U.K. to which I was graciously invited. There were a couple of days, all in the ‘Victorian bustle’ theme, so it was the perfect reason to make a new garment. The event was lovely, and I really loved wearing this new dress. As always, I have some small things I want to fix already (mostly necklines which wanted to gap open a little), but overall I’m really happy with how it turned out. This fabric was a joy to work with and wear.

Thanks to Serena and Melchior for taking some pictures for me!

It was originally inspired by this dress from the MET:

MET museum Evening dressca. 1880 Wechsler & Abraham 

I changed the underskirt to better suit my taste and fabric stash, inspired by the design of this dress:

NGV. Day dress (c. 1883) ENGLAND Medium silk, cotton lace, metal Accession Number 1411.a-b-D5

And I added a ballgown bodice based mostly on this existent one;

“Evening dress, 1886-87. Philadelphia Museum of Art.”